Skip to content

Engineering Methodology

This page documents the methodological principles I apply when designing long-lived, integration-heavy software systems.

It is not a generic development workflow, but a system design doctrine grounded in runtime governance, architectural invariants, and evolvability.

System Design Doctrine

I treat software systems as governed execution environments, not as collections of isolated features.

This implies:

  • architecture is a first-class artifact
  • invariants are explicit and enforced
  • runtime behavior is validated, not assumed
  • execution contexts are isolated and controlled
  • system evolution is an intentional design concern

The goal is not to maximize short-term delivery speed, but to preserve structural integrity over time.

Contract-First Development

I design systems starting from contracts, not implementations.

A contract defines:

  • what a component must provide
  • what it is allowed to depend on
  • under which conditions it is valid
  • which invariants it must preserve

This approach:

  • reduces implicit assumptions
  • prevents architectural drift
  • makes integration failures deterministic
  • decouples evolution from breakage

Contracts act as architectural boundaries between components, plugins, and runtime layers.

Runtime Governance

I explicitly govern what is allowed to enter a runtime.

This includes:

  • validating modules before execution
  • enforcing environment constraints
  • isolating plugin contexts
  • blocking non-conforming components
  • propagating structured diagnostics

Runtime governance transforms runtime from a best-effort execution space into a controlled and inspectable system layer.

Modularity & Plugin Architectures

I favor plugin-based architectures when systems must:

  • integrate heterogeneous capabilities
  • evolve without centralized redeployment
  • support third-party extensions
  • remain vendor-agnostic

Key principles I apply:

  • strict plugin boundaries
  • explicit plugin lifecycles
  • context isolation
  • versioned interfaces
  • backward-compatible evolution

Plugins are treated as first-class architectural units, not as ad-hoc extensions.

Validation & Diagnostics

I design validation as a core architectural capability, not as an afterthought.

This involves:

  • structural validation of components
  • contextual validation of environments
  • runtime invariant checks
  • deterministic failure semantics
  • structured error propagation

Failures should be:

  • early
  • explicit
  • reproducible
  • diagnosable

This significantly reduces operational ambiguity and debugging cost in production systems.

Tooling as Architecture

I treat developer tooling as part of the system architecture.

This includes:

  • CLI-driven workflows
  • contract validation tools
  • packaging and deployment automation
  • reproducible environment setup
  • runtime inspection utilities

Tooling is not auxiliary; it is a governance mechanism that enforces architectural rules in practice.

Testing Philosophy (TDD)

I apply Test-Driven Development (TDD) not only at the code level, but at the system behavior level.

My approach to testing includes:

  • unit tests for core logic
  • contract tests for component boundaries
  • integration tests for runtime flows
  • regression tests for invariants
  • failure-mode tests for diagnostics

Tests are used to lock down:

  • architectural assumptions
  • compatibility guarantees
  • runtime behavior
  • evolution safety

Long-Term Evolution Strategy

I design systems to evolve safely over time.

This involves:

  • backward-compatible contract changes
  • minimum-compatibility validation models
  • versioned interfaces
  • gradual deprecation paths
  • explicit migration strategies

System evolution is treated as a first-class architectural problem, not as a maintenance afterthought.

This methodology reflects the design principles applied in the case studies and projects documented on this site, including ImportSpy and the SAFE backend platforms.